page-scan ............prev...................v?....................next 
{{prhprp342.jpg}}

 

> engaging as ever, but without any symptom of peculiar regard; and
> I remained convinced, from the evening's scrutiny, that though she
> received his attentions with pleasure, she did not invite them by
> any participation of sentiment. If _you_ have not been mistaken here.
> I must have been in an error. Your superior knowledge of your
> sister must make the latter probable. If it be so, if I have been
> misled by such error to inflict pain on her, your resentment has not
> been unreasonable. But I shall not scruple to assert that the serenity
> of your sister's countenance and air was such as might have given
> the most acute observer a conviction that, however amiable her
> temper, her heart was not likely to be easily touched. That I was
> desirous of believing her indifferent is certain; but I will venture
> to say that my investigations and decisions are not usually influenced
> by my hopes or fears. I did not believe her to be indifferent because
> I wished it; I believed it on impartial conviction, as truly as I wished
> it in reason. My objections to the marriage were not merely those
> which I last night acknowledged to have required the utmost force
> of passion to put aside in my own case; the want of connection
> could not be so great an evil to my friend as to me. But there were
> other causes of repugnance; causes which, though still existing, and
> existing to an equal degree in both instances, I had myself endeav-
> oured to forget, because they were not immediately before me. These
> causes must be stated, though briefly. The situation of your mother's
> family, though objectionable, was nothing in comparison of that total
> want of propriety so frequently, so almost uniformly betrayed by
> herself, by your three younger sisters, and occasionally even by your
> father: -- pardon me, -- it pains me to offend you. But amidst your
> concern for the defects of your nearest relations, and your displeasure
> at this representation of them, let it give you consolation to consider
> that to have conducted yourselves so as to avoid any share of the
> like censure is praise no less generally bestowed on you and your
> elder sister than it is honourable to the sense and disposition of
> both. I will only say, farther, that from what passed that evening
> my opinion of all parties was confirmed, and every inducement
> heightened, which could have led me before to preserve my friend
> from what I esteemed a most unhappy connection. He left Nether-
> field for London on the day following, as you, I am certain, re-
> member, with the design of soon returning. The part which I acted
> is now to be explained. His sisters' uneasiness had been equally
> excited with my own: our coincidence of feeling was soon discovered;
> and, alike sensible that no time was to be lost in detaching their
> brother, we shortly resolved on joining him directly in London. We
> accordingly went -- and there I readily engaged in the office of
> pointing out to my friend the certain evils of such a choice. I
> described and enforced them earnestly. But however this remon-
> strance might have staggered or delayed his determination, I do
> not suppose that it would ultimately have prevented the marriage, had
> it not been seconded by the assurance, which I hesitated not in
> giving, of your sister's indifference. He had before believed her to
> return his affection with sincere, if not with equal, regard. But

 

 [342]
............prev.....................next................

v?
name
e-mail

bad

new


or